Machrovicz v. Bronx Road Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Machrovicz v. Bronx Road Associates, Inc.

240 A.D. 987

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 987 (Machrovicz v. Bronx Road Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Machrovicz v. Bronx Road Associates, Inc., 240 A.D. 987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that it was error to exclude the testimony offered at folio 489. Reliance upon the advices of the mason subcontractor is an element which a jury might properly consider in determining if defendant, appellant, was negligent in respect of one of the claims of negligence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that it was error to exclude the testimony offered at folio 489. Reliance upon the advices of the mason subcontractor is an element which a jury might properly consider in determining if defendant, appellant, was negligent in respect of one of the claims of negligence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/machrovicz-v-bronx-road-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1933.