Machrovicz v. Bronx Road Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Machrovicz v. Bronx Road Associates, Inc.

240 A.D. 987

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that it was error to exclude the testimony offered at folio 489. Reliance upon the advices of the mason subcontractor is an element which a jury might properly consider in determining if defendant, appellant, was negligent in respect of one of the claims of negligence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that it was error to exclude the testimony offered at folio 489. Reliance upon the advices of the mason subcontractor is an element which a jury might properly consider in determining if defendant, appellant, was negligent in respect of one of the claims of negligence.

Machrovicz v. Bronx Road Associates, Inc., 240 A.D. 987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 987 (Machrovicz v. Bronx Road Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.