Machot Kuol Mayen v. Hasan
This text of 517 F. App'x 130 (Machot Kuol Mayen v. Hasan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Machot Kuol Mayen appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice Mayen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Mayen’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Mayen has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, although we grant Mayen leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny as moot his motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
517 F. App'x 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/machot-kuol-mayen-v-hasan-ca4-2013.