Machette v. State
This text of Machette v. State (Machette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
RICHARD D. MACHETTE, § § Defendant Below, § No. 268, 2018 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 0608007451 (K) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 28, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
This 23rd day of July 2018, after careful consideration of the appellant’s
opening brief, the appellee’s motion to affirm, and the record below, we conclude
that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s
April 26, 2018 order. The Superior Court did not err in summarily dismissing the
appellant’s fourth motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal
Rule 61. The motion was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the pleading
requirements of Rule 61(d)(2). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED
and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Machette v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/machette-v-state-del-2018.