MacGregor-Phillips v. MacGregor

273 A.D.2d 206, 709 N.Y.S.2d 446, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6248

This text of 273 A.D.2d 206 (MacGregor-Phillips v. MacGregor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacGregor-Phillips v. MacGregor, 273 A.D.2d 206, 709 N.Y.S.2d 446, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for an accounting and to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), entered March 16, 1999, as granted that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground of res judicata.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see, O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353; Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v Lopez, 46 NY2d 481).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. Lopez
386 N.E.2d 1328 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
O'Brien v. City of Syracuse
429 N.E.2d 1158 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D.2d 206, 709 N.Y.S.2d 446, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macgregor-phillips-v-macgregor-nyappdiv-2000.