Home/New York Court of Appeals/MacGaffick v. Lavine

MacGaffick v. Lavine

343 N.E.2d 754, 38 N.Y.2d 719, 381 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2312
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 20, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 343 N.E.2d 754 (MacGaffick v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacGaffick v. Lavine, 343 N.E.2d 754, 38 N.Y.2d 719, 381 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2312 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division concerning the discretionary powers of the commissioner in the interpretation of the applicable statutes and regulations.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

[721]*721Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1976
Lawrence v. Lavine
343 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 N.E.2d 754, 38 N.Y.2d 719, 381 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macgaffick-v-lavine-ny-1975.