Macfarland v. Buck

Supreme Court of Kansas

Macfarland v. Buck

27 Kan. 783

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJanuary 15, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 Kan. 783 (Macfarland v. Buck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Macfarland v. Buck, 27 Kan. 783 (kan 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It is said by this court in Robinson v. Melvin, 14 Kas. 487, in reviewing an order of a district court discharging an attachment, that the judgment of the district court, even upon written testimony, is entitled to consideration, and in many doubtful cases may sometimes turn the balance in favor of affirmance. These remarks have special fitness in this case. There.seems to be sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the order of the district court, and therefore it will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

It is said by this court in Robinson v. Melvin, 14 Kas. 487, in reviewing an order of a district court discharging an attachment, that the judgment of the district court, even upon written testimony, is entitled to consideration, and in many doubtful cases may sometimes turn the balance in favor of affirmance. These remarks have special fitness in this case. There.seems to be sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the order of the district court, and therefore it will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Kan. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macfarland-v-buck-kan-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack