Macey v. Rozbicki

23 A.D.2d 532, 256 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5035

This text of 23 A.D.2d 532 (Macey v. Rozbicki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Macey v. Rozbicki, 23 A.D.2d 532, 256 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinions

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered January 29, 1964, in Erie County, which granted a motion by defendants for an order dismissing the complaint and granting summary judgment to defendants.

Memorandum by the Court. In our opinion the ease of Babcock v. Jackson (12 N Y 2d 473) does not apply to the facts of the present case. This case seems rather to come within the comparatively limiting scope of Dym v. Gordon (22 A D 2d 702). The preponderance of contacts in the present ease are much more akin to the Dym case than to the Babcock ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.
19 N.E.2d 992 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Auten v. Auten
124 N.E.2d 99 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.2d 532, 256 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macey-v-rozbicki-nyappdiv-1965.