Mace v. State

733 S.W.2d 851, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4480
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 28, 1987·No. No. 52748·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mace v. State, 733 S.W.2d 851, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4480 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

733 S.W.2d 851 (Mace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.