Mace v. Pearlman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mace v. Pearlman

47 A.D.2d 818, 367 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9153

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 818 (Mace v. Pearlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mace v. Pearlman, 47 A.D.2d 818, 367 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered September 16, 1974, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting the motion of plaintiff-appellant to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No change is made in any of the issues by the granting of this motion. It was timely made on the basis of recently acquired additional information, and the Statute of Limitations on the claim has not run. It would be time wasting to relegate plaintiff to the institution of a new action. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered September 16, 1974, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting the motion of plaintiff-appellant to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No change is made in any of the issues by the granting of this motion. It was timely made on the basis of recently acquired additional information, and the Statute of Limitations on the claim has not run. It would be time wasting to relegate plaintiff to the institution of a new action. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 818, 367 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mace-v-pearlman-nyappdiv-1975.