MacDonald v. Reed

Michigan Supreme Court

MacDonald v. Reed

724 N.W.2d 469, 477 Mich. 967

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 13, 2006

Docket132071

StatusPublished

This text of 724 N.W.2d 469 (MacDonald v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacDonald v. Reed, 724 N.W.2d 469, 477 Mich. 967 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

724 N.W.2d 469 (2006)

Raymond MacDONALD, and The Scarab Club, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Patricia REED, James Tottis, Breta Brookes, Ronald Miller, John Allen, George Booth, Donna Cyrbok, Ric Geyer, Ralph Hartshorn, Lynn Jovick, John Wickey, William Murcko, and Marisa Lenhard, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 132071, COA No. 264940.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 13, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion to strike is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Costs of $250 are assessed against plaintiff MacDonald in favor of defendants under MCR 7.316(D)(1) for filing a vexatious appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

724 N.W.2d 469 (2006)

Raymond MacDONALD, and The Scarab Club, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Patricia REED, James Tottis, Breta Brookes, Ronald Miller, John Allen, George Booth, Donna Cyrbok, Ric Geyer, Ralph Hartshorn, Lynn Jovick, John Wickey, William Murcko, and Marisa Lenhard, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 132071, COA No. 264940.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 13, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion to strike is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Costs of $250 are assessed against plaintiff MacDonald in favor of defendants under MCR 7.316(D)(1) for filing a vexatious appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 N.W.2d 469, 477 Mich. 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macdonald-v-reed-mich-2006.

Opinion

Raymond MacDONALD, and The Scarab Club, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Patricia REED, James Tottis, Breta Brookes, Ronald Miller, John Allen, George Booth, Donna Cyrbok, Ric Geyer, Ralph Hartshorn, Lynn Jovick, John Wickey, William Murcko, and Marisa Lenhard, Defendants-Appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Raymond MacDONALD, and The Scarab Club, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Patricia REED, James Tottis, Breta Brookes, Ronald Miller, John Allen, George Booth, Donna Cyrbok, Ric Geyer, Ralph Hartshorn, Lynn Jovick, John Wickey, William Murcko, and Marisa Lenhard, Defendants-Appellees.