MacDonald v. Moriarty
This text of 460 A.2d 1374 (MacDonald v. Moriarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Plaintiff MacDonald appeals from a Superior Court, Oxford County, denial of his appeal from a District Court order requiring him to pay Moriarty’s attorneys’ fees in his child custody action. We affirm the judgment.
On May 19,1982, a judgment was entered denying MacDonald’s motion for custody and ordering MacDonald to pay Moriarty’s attorneys’ fees. MacDonald contends on appeal that M.R.Civ.P. 80G(c), which permits the assessment of attorneys’ fees in custody actions “[a]t any time prior to judgment,” required that the award of attorneys’ fees be entered on the docket in a separate order prior to the order denying his custody motion. Even assuming that the incorporation of the two orders into one docket entry violated Rule 80G(c), however, the attorneys’ fee award had already been entered separately on the docket on May 12, 1982. We therefore find no merit to MacDonald’s appeal.
We do, however, order the case remanded to the District Court for the sole purpose of entertaining a motion for consideration of awarding attorneys’ fees on appeal to Moriarty. See Gardner v. Perry, 405 A.2d 721, 726 (Me.1979); Strater v. Strater, 159 Me. 508, 521-22, 196 A.2d 94, 101 (1963).
The entry is:
Appeal denied.
Judgment affirmed.
Case remanded to the Superior Court to remand to the District Court for the purpose of entertaining a motion for Moriarty’s attorneys’ fees on appeal.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
460 A.2d 1374, 1983 Me. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macdonald-v-moriarty-me-1983.