MacDonald v. MacDonald

73 A.D.2d 958, 424 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9889
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 28, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which, inter alia, the plaintiff wife was granted a divorce, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated July 20, 1979, as denied defendant’s motion to modify the provisions of the judgment of divorce and in part granted plaintiffs cross motion. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Defendant husband, inter alia, sought to modify that portion of a 1975 judgment of divorce which stated that a stipulation between the parties would be incorporated but not merged in the judgment. He based his argument on the fact that the stipulation itself contained no provision for survival. Defendant could have made an attack on that provision of the judgment of divorce had he appealed therefrom (see Nicoletti v Nicoletti, 43 AD2d 699). Having failed to appeal, he is bound by the provisions of the judgment of divorce including the provision for survival of [959]*959the stipulation (see Goldman v Goldman, 69 AD2d 758; Chanin v Chanin, 59 AD2d 671). Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacDonald v. MacDonald, 73 A.D.2d 958, 424 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

73 A.D.2d 958 (MacDonald v. MacDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Veraldo v. Veraldo
151 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Rainbow v. Swisher
527 N.E.2d 258 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)