MacDonald v. MacDonald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MacDonald v. MacDonald

73 A.D.2d 958, 424 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 73 A.D.2d 958 (MacDonald v. MacDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacDonald v. MacDonald, 73 A.D.2d 958, 424 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which, inter alia, the plaintiff wife was granted a divorce, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated July 20, 1979, as denied defendant’s motion to modify the provisions of the judgment of divorce and in part granted plaintiffs cross motion. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Defendant husband, inter alia, sought to modify that portion of a 1975 judgment of divorce which stated that a stipulation between the parties would be incorporated but not merged in the judgment. He based his argument on the fact that the stipulation itself contained no provision for survival. Defendant could have made an attack on that provision of the judgment of divorce had he appealed therefrom (see Nicoletti v Nicoletti, 43 AD2d 699). Having failed to appeal, he is bound by the provisions of the judgment of divorce including the provision for survival of [959]*959the stipulation (see Goldman v Goldman, 69 AD2d 758; Chanin v Chanin, 59 AD2d 671). Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action in which, inter alia, the plaintiff wife was granted a divorce, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated July 20, 1979, as denied defendant’s motion to modify the provisions of the judgment of divorce and in part granted plaintiffs cross motion. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Defendant husband, inter alia, sought to modify that portion of a 1975 judgment of divorce which stated that a stipulation between the parties would be incorporated but not merged in the judgment. He based his argument on the fact that the stipulation itself contained no provision for survival. Defendant could have made an attack on that provision of the judgment of divorce had he appealed therefrom (see Nicoletti v Nicoletti, 43 AD2d 699). Having failed to appeal, he is bound by the provisions of the judgment of divorce including the provision for survival of [959]*959the stipulation (see Goldman v Goldman, 69 AD2d 758; Chanin v Chanin, 59 AD2d 671). Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 958, 424 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macdonald-v-macdonald-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack