MacDonald v. Goldner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MacDonald v. Goldner

151 A.D.2d 451, 543 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8872

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 A.D.2d 451 (MacDonald v. Goldner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacDonald v. Goldner, 151 A.D.2d 451, 543 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered March 3, 1988, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to reargue and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior decision, is unanimously modified on the law to the extent of vacating the court’s prior order and granting summary judgment to plaintiffs directing defendants to offer a renewal lease, with costs and disbursements.

[452]*452This court’s recent determination in Festa v Leshen (145 AD2d 49), which upheld the succession provisions of the Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR 2523.5 [b] [1], [2]), is dispositive herein. Accordingly, defendants are required to offer plaintiff daughter a renewal lease. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered March 3, 1988, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to reargue and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior decision, is unanimously modified on the law to the extent of vacating the court’s prior order and granting summary judgment to plaintiffs directing defendants to offer a renewal lease, with costs and disbursements.

[452]*452This court’s recent determination in Festa v Leshen (145 AD2d 49), which upheld the succession provisions of the Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR 2523.5 [b] [1], [2]), is dispositive herein. Accordingly, defendants are required to offer plaintiff daughter a renewal lease. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 A.D.2d 451, 543 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macdonald-v-goldner-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack