MacDonald v. Estate of Hamza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MacDonald v. Estate of Hamza

170 A.D.2d 1010

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 1991·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant moved for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a "serious injury” (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Supreme Court correctly denied the motion. Defendant’s contention that a chiropractor is an incompetent witness to [1011]*1011establish serious injury in this case is without merit (see, Badke v Barnett, 35 AD2d 347). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.—Negligence.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant moved for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a "serious injury” (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Supreme Court correctly denied the motion. Defendant’s contention that a chiropractor is an incompetent witness to [1011]*1011establish serious injury in this case is without merit (see, Badke v Barnett, 35 AD2d 347). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.—Negligence.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

MacDonald v. Estate of Hamza, 170 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

170 A.D.2d 1010 (MacDonald v. Estate of Hamza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related