MacDonald v. Estate of Hamza
This text of 170 A.D.2d 1010 (MacDonald v. Estate of Hamza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant moved for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a "serious injury” (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Supreme Court correctly denied the motion. Defendant’s contention that a chiropractor is an incompetent witness to [1011]*1011establish serious injury in this case is without merit (see, Badke v Barnett, 35 AD2d 347). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.—Negligence.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D.2d 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macdonald-v-estate-of-hamza-nyappdiv-1991.