MacDonald v. Elbert County

Supreme Court of Georgia

MacDonald v. Elbert County

144 S.E.2d 367, 221 Ga. 318, 1965 Ga. LEXIS 445

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 9, 1965

Docket23027

StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E.2d 367 (MacDonald v. Elbert County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacDonald v. Elbert County, 144 S.E.2d 367, 221 Ga. 318, 1965 Ga. LEXIS 445 (Ga. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Mobley, Justice.

Plaintiffs in the lower court excepted to the order of the trial court “granting interlocutory injunction in part against the defendant State Highway Department of Georgia and denying all relief against defendants Elbert County and Knox-Rivers Construction Co.” and to the denial of the injunction against defendants as prayed.

The ruling of case No. 23028 controls this case, contrary to the contention here made, as the ruling was there made that the plaintiffs were not entitled to an injunction against any of the defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Cook, J., disqualified. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, E. J. Su-mmerour, Richard L. Chambers, Assistant Attorneys General, Grant & Matthews, William F. Grant, Robert E. Knox, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mobley, Justice.

Plaintiffs in the lower court excepted to the order of the trial court “granting interlocutory injunction in part against the defendant State Highway Department of Georgia and denying all relief against defendants Elbert County and Knox-Rivers Construction Co.” and to the denial of the injunction against defendants as prayed.

The ruling of case No. 23028 controls this case, contrary to the contention here made, as the ruling was there made that the plaintiffs were not entitled to an injunction against any of the defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Cook, J., disqualified. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, E. J. Su-mmerour, Richard L. Chambers, Assistant Attorneys General, Grant & Matthews, William F. Grant, Robert E. Knox, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 S.E.2d 367, 221 Ga. 318, 1965 Ga. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macdonald-v-elbert-county-ga-1965.