MacDonald Okechukwu Osuagwu v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 15, 2008
Docket14-08-00292-CR
StatusPublished

This text of MacDonald Okechukwu Osuagwu v. State (MacDonald Okechukwu Osuagwu v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacDonald Okechukwu Osuagwu v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00292-CR

MACDONALD OKECHUKWU OSUAGWU, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 126673

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of possession of marijuana, and on October 22, 2007, the court sentenced appellant to confinement in jail for 90 days.  No timely motion for new trial was filed.  Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed until April 2, 2008.


A defendant=s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal.  Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  Id.

Appellant=s notice of appeal is untimely.[1]  Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



[1]  The record contains appellant=s request for an out-of-time appeal.  The record does not contain an order granting the request, and this court lacks the power to consider a request for an out-of-time appeal, which must be brought by an application for writ of habeas corpus.  See generally Rodriguez v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Supreme Judicial Dist., 769 S.W.2d 554, 556-59 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Supreme Judicial District
769 S.W.2d 554 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MacDonald Okechukwu Osuagwu v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macdonald-okechukwu-osuagwu-v-state-texapp-2008.