MacCrone v. Higbie
This text of 255 N.W. 315 (MacCrone v. Higbie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Catherine E. Bigelow brought an action against the plaintiff to recover the amount due on a land contract executed by him. She recovered a judgment therefor in the circuit court, and, on appeal to this court, it was affirmed. Bigelow v. MacCrone,ante, 217.
While this action was pending in the circuit court, the plaintiff filed the bill of complaint herein to enjoin its further prosecution. After proofs taken, it was dismissed. Plaintiff appealed.
The relief sought was available to the plaintiff in the action at law, and the chancery court had no jurisdiction.Munz Spralawn Corp. v. White Chapel Memorial Ass'n,
The decree is affirmed, with costs to appellees.
POTTER, NORTH, FEAD, WIEST, BUTZEL, BUSHNELL, and EDWARD M. SHARPE, JJ., concurred. *Page 648
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 N.W. 315, 267 Mich. 647, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maccrone-v-higbie-mich-1934.