MacCoy v. Joseph F. McCoy Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

MacCoy v. Joseph F. McCoy Co.

2 N.J. Misc. 207, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 239

DecidedMarch 12, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J. Misc. 207 (MacCoy v. Joseph F. McCoy Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacCoy v. Joseph F. McCoy Co., 2 N.J. Misc. 207, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Ceeiam.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to accord to relators, with the assistance of counsel and accountants, an inspection and examination of the by-laws and minutes, books, papers, accounts and records of respondent.

We think the proofs fully warrant the awarding of the writ applied for.

The awarding of writs of mandamus in such cases is fully and satisfactorily expressed by the opinion of Mr. Justice Kalisch in this court in Feick v. Hill Bread Co., 91 N. J. L. 486.

A peremptory writ of mandamus may issue as prayed for, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ceeiam.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to accord to relators, with the assistance of counsel and accountants, an inspection and examination of the by-laws and minutes, books, papers, accounts and records of respondent.

We think the proofs fully warrant the awarding of the writ applied for.

The awarding of writs of mandamus in such cases is fully and satisfactorily expressed by the opinion of Mr. Justice Kalisch in this court in Feick v. Hill Bread Co., 91 N. J. L. 486.

A peremptory writ of mandamus may issue as prayed for, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.J. Misc. 207, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maccoy-v-joseph-f-mccoy-co-nj-1924.