MacClelland v. Swift & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MacClelland v. Swift & Co.

258 A.D. 815, 15 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7071

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 815 (MacClelland v. Swift & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacClelland v. Swift & Co., 258 A.D. 815, 15 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile which struck the infant while the latter was crossing a public highway; and separate action by his father to recover for medical and other expenses and for loss of the infant’s services. The actions were tried together. Prom a judgment in favor of the infant plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, defendant appeals. Prom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff (father), entered upon the verdict of a jury, defendant also appeals. Judgments unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile which struck the infant while the latter was crossing a public highway; and separate action by his father to recover for medical and other expenses and for loss of the infant’s services. The actions were tried together. Prom a judgment in favor of the infant plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, defendant appeals. Prom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff (father), entered upon the verdict of a jury, defendant also appeals. Judgments unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 815, 15 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macclelland-v-swift-co-nyappdiv-1939.