Macchirole v. Giamboi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Macchirole v. Giamboi

281 A.D.2d 401, 721 N.Y.S.2d 267, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2120

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D.2d 401 (Macchirole v. Giamboi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Macchirole v. Giamboi, 281 A.D.2d 401, 721 N.Y.S.2d 267, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated October 27, 1999, which, upon granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The injured plaintiffs deposition testimony established that he accepted Workers’ Compensation benefits in connection with the accident in question. Thus, he is barred as a matter of law from maintaining an action against the defendant Joseph Giamboi, his féllow employee (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]; Cunningham v State of New York, 60 NY2d 248; Gagliardi v Trapp, 221 AD2d 315).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated October 27, 1999, which, upon granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The injured plaintiffs deposition testimony established that he accepted Workers’ Compensation benefits in connection with the accident in question. Thus, he is barred as a matter of law from maintaining an action against the defendant Joseph Giamboi, his féllow employee (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]; Cunningham v State of New York, 60 NY2d 248; Gagliardi v Trapp, 221 AD2d 315).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 401, 721 N.Y.S.2d 267, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macchirole-v-giamboi-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack