Maccarini v. New Haven Trap Rock Co.

Second Circuit

Maccarini v. New Haven Trap Rock Co.

249 F.2d 893

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 12, 1957

DocketNo. 78, Docket 24611

StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 893 (Maccarini v. New Haven Trap Rock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maccarini v. New Haven Trap Rock Co., 249 F.2d 893 (2d Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff, an employee of Westchester Colprovia Corporation, while working on premises owned by the defendant, tried to the court and a jury. Federal jurisdiction rests on diversity of citizenship, and the applicable law is that of New York as the premises are located in that state. At the close of all the evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict. Decision was reserved and the case was submitted to the jury, which disagreed. The defendant then moved for judgment on its prior motion and also moved for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s disagreement. These motions were granted, with an opinion. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion below, reported in 148 F.Supp. 271.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff, an employee of Westchester Colprovia Corporation, while working on premises owned by the defendant, tried to the court and a jury. Federal jurisdiction rests on diversity of citizenship, and the applicable law is that of New York as the premises are located in that state. At the close of all the evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict. Decision was reserved and the case was submitted to the jury, which disagreed. The defendant then moved for judgment on its prior motion and also moved for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s disagreement. These motions were granted, with an opinion. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion below, reported in 148 F.Supp. 271.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maccarini-v-new-haven-trap-rock-co-ca2-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack