MacBrien-Collins v. Gidron Oldsmobile & Cadillac, L.L.C.

39 A.D.3d 238, 831 N.Y.S.2d 711

This text of 39 A.D.3d 238 (MacBrien-Collins v. Gidron Oldsmobile & Cadillac, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacBrien-Collins v. Gidron Oldsmobile & Cadillac, L.L.C., 39 A.D.3d 238, 831 N.Y.S.2d 711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered January 10, 2006, which granted the motion of defendant Gidron Oldsmobile & Cadillac for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant demonstrated that it is not the alter ego of the corporate entity on whose premises plaintiff was injured, thus shifting the burden to plaintiff, whose submissions were insufficient to raise an issue of fact in that regard (see Stankowski v Kim, 286 AD2d 282, 283 [2001], appeal dismissed 97 NY2d 677 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stankowski v. Kim
286 A.D.2d 282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.3d 238, 831 N.Y.S.2d 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macbrien-collins-v-gidron-oldsmobile-cadillac-llc-nyappdiv-2007.