MacBain v. Bowling

374 So. 2d 75
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1979
Docket78-1875
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 374 So. 2d 75 (MacBain v. Bowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacBain v. Bowling, 374 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

374 So.2d 75 (1979)

Janet P. MacBAIN, Appellant,
v.
James W. BOWLING, Appellee.

No. 78-1875.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1979.
Rehearing Denied September 14, 1979.

*76 Brigham & Brigham and Dana P. Brigham, Miami, for appellant.

Vernis & Bowling, Coconut Grove, and Andrew J. Anthony, Miami, McCormick, Bedford & Backmeyer and Edward J. McCormick, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ., and CHAPPELL, BILL G., Associate Judge.

BARKDULL, Judge.

Janet P. MacBain, plaintiff in the trial court, takes this appeal from an order taxing costs in favor of the appellee in the amount of $641.00 and reserving jurisdiction on the appellee's request for attorney's fees.

The appellant voluntarily dismissed her action, initiated against the appellee to establish a constructive trust and a resulting trust on certain real property located in Dade County. The appellee responded with a motion to tax costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, on the authority of Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.420(a) and Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1978). These provisions allow for costs and for reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in those cases where the court finds that there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue of law or fact raised by the losing party. In response to this motion, the trial court entered an order awarding the appellee $641.00 in costs and deferring a ruling on attorney's fees until a later date. This appeal followed.

As to the costs, they were authorized under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(d), but not attorney's fees under this rule. See: Randle-Eastern Ambulance Services, Inc. v. Vasta, 360 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1978). However, subsequent to the Randle decision, supra, the Legislature passed (and it became effective) what is now Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1978), and we hold that a trial judge is now authorized to award attorney's fees upon a voluntary dismissal if he finds "... a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised . .". A voluntary dismissal should authorize the award of fees under this statute, pursuant to the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Randle, supra, and pursuant to the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, recently rendered in Gordon v. Warren Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 340 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), wherein they permitted attorney's fees to be recovered under the mechanic's lien statute, Section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1975), which is similar to Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1978).

Therefore, the order under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Western Group Nurseries, Inc. v. Ergas
167 F.3d 1354 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Western Group Nurseries v. Ergas
167 F.3d 1354 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Bay View Inn, Inc. v. Friedman
545 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Muniz v. Samero
534 So. 2d 848 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Spear v. Spear
516 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Ferrara v. Caves
475 So. 2d 1295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Centro Lines v. New Hampshire Insurance
11 Fla. Supp. 2d 109 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1985)
51 Island Way Condo. Ass'n v. Williams
458 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Nolan v. Altman
449 So. 2d 898 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Reineke v. McKinstry
445 So. 2d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
McKelvey v. Kismet, Inc.
430 So. 2d 919 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Puder v. Raymond Int'l Builders, Inc.
424 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Merrill Enterprises, Inc. v. Barkett Oil Co. of Florida
421 So. 2d 770 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
ROMAR INTERN., INC. v. Jim Rathman Chevrolet/Cadillac, Inc.
420 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Fierer v. 18th Ave. Development Corp.
417 So. 2d 1005 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Castaway Lounge of Bay County, Inc. v. Reid
411 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.
410 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. v. Hall
409 So. 2d 193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Galbraith v. Inglese
402 So. 2d 574 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 So. 2d 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macbain-v-bowling-fladistctapp-1979.