Macaulay Co. v. Winchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Macaulay Co. v. Winchell

259 A.D. 300, 19 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 300 (Macaulay Co. v. Winchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Macaulay Co. v. Winchell, 259 A.D. 300, 19 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the Special Term that, although a small part of the matter alleged in the first separate and complete defense of truth and fair comment may be proper, the defense as presently pleaded does not fully meet the allegation of libel set forth in the complaint. It is fundamental that a plea in justification must be as broad as the charge and set forth the facts on which it is alleged that the charge as made is true. (Bingham v. Gaynor, 141 App. Div. 301; affd., 203 N. Y. 27, 34.) As the partial defense realleged by reference all of the allegations of theS first defense that 'had been stricken out, the order must be interpreted as striking ■out both the first defense and the first partial defense as pleaded.

[301]*301The order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiff, with leave to defendants to serve an amended answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order to be entered herein upon payment of said costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermter, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to serve an amended answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We agree with the Special Term that, although a small part of the matter alleged in the first separate and complete defense of truth and fair comment may be proper, the defense as presently pleaded does not fully meet the allegation of libel set forth in the complaint. It is fundamental that a plea in justification must be as broad as the charge and set forth the facts on which it is alleged that the charge as made is true. (Bingham v. Gaynor, 141 App. Div. 301; affd., 203 N. Y. 27, 34.) As the partial defense realleged by reference all of the allegations of theS first defense that 'had been stricken out, the order must be interpreted as striking ■out both the first defense and the first partial defense as pleaded.

[301]*301The order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiff, with leave to defendants to serve an amended answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order to be entered herein upon payment of said costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermter, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to serve an amended answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 300, 19 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macaulay-co-v-winchell-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack