Macarty v. Lepaullard

4 Rob. 425
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1843
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Rob. 425 (Macarty v. Lepaullard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Macarty v. Lepaullard, 4 Rob. 425 (La. 1843).

Opinion

Bullard, J.

The defendants are appellants from a judgment of the City Court, dispossessing them of property alleged to have been leased by them of the plaintiff, on account of their non-co.mpliance with the conditions of the lease.

On the trial, the defendants opposed the reading of a copy of a lease, because there appeared to have been changes made, which are indicated in the margin, but which marginal notes had not been signed, or paraphed by the parlies. A bill of exceptions was taken.

The court, in our opinion, erred. Until all the parties had approved the proposed change in the contract, it was not valid, and consequently was inadmissible.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the City Court be reversed ; that the case be remanded with instructions not to admit the copy to be read in evidence, until it shall appear that all the parties have sanctioned the change ; and that the plaintiff pay the costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Nat. Bank v. Winn
64 So. 495 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Rob. 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macarty-v-lepaullard-la-1843.