MacArthur v. State
This text of 739 So. 2d 681 (MacArthur v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22, 24 (Fla.1986)(“It is well established that a court may refuse to address those issues contained in a motion for post-conviction relief that were raised on direct appeal or could have been raised on direct appeal”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1077, 108 S.Ct. 1057, 98 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1988); Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); MacArthur v. State, 668 So.2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Anderson v. State, 467 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (holding that trial counsel is not deemed ineffective bécause of strategic decisions made during trial).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 So. 2d 681, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11559, 1999 WL 641647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macarthur-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.