MacArthur v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MacArthur v. State

739 So. 2d 681, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11559, 1999 WL 641647

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 1999·No. No. 99-1297·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22, 24 (Fla.1986)(“It is well established that a court may refuse to address those issues contained in a motion for post-conviction relief that were raised on direct appeal or could have been raised on direct appeal”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1077, 108 S.Ct. 1057, 98 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1988); Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); MacArthur v. State, 668 So.2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Anderson v. State, 467 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (holding that trial counsel is not deemed ineffective bécause of strategic decisions made during trial).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22, 24 (Fla.1986)(“It is well established that a court may refuse to address those issues contained in a motion for post-conviction relief that were raised on direct appeal or could have been raised on direct appeal”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1077, 108 S.Ct. 1057, 98 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1988); Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); MacArthur v. State, 668 So.2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Anderson v. State, 467 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (holding that trial counsel is not deemed ineffective bécause of strategic decisions made during trial).

MacArthur v. State, 739 So. 2d 681, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11559, 1999 WL 641647 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

739 So. 2d 681 (MacArthur v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related