Macari v. Marichal

107 A.D.3d 808, 966 N.Y.S.2d 685
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding, in effect, pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 for child support and related relief, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), dated September 8, 2011, as denied, without a hearing, his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The father failed to make a prima facie showing of a substantial change in circumstances. Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, the father’s petition for a downward modification of his child support obligations (see Matter of Bono v Pitre, 97 AD3d 743 [2012]). Skelos, J.P., Angiolillo, Roman and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Macari v. Marichal, 107 A.D.3d 808, 966 N.Y.S.2d 685 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

107 A.D.3d 808 (Macari v. Marichal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spiegel-Porco v. Porco
127 A.D.3d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)