MACAN ESTATES, INC. v. McGoldrick
Opinion
There was ample basis for the orders of respondent State Rent Administrator of April 24,1952, decreasing the rent because of the diminution of essential services promised by the landlord and that rent reduction was properly continued as long as the services in question were withheld. While it appears that the landlord resumed furnishing such services in January of 1953, it also appears that the Administrator, by order, approved and directed restoration of the rent reductions.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ., concur; Van Voorhis, J., taking no part.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
114 N.E.2d 217 (MACAN ESTATES, INC. v. McGoldrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.