Macaluso v. Watson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Macaluso v. Watson

190 So. 2d 910, 249 La. 743, 1966 La. LEXIS 2147

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 21, 1966·No. No. 48352·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re: Ellis L. Macaluso applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 188 So.2d 178.

The application is denied. There is no error of law in the judgment complained of.

McCALEB, J., concurs, being of the opinion that plaintiff should have alternatively moved for a non-suit in either the trial court or the Court of Appeal as to his liability insurer. His application for a remand on petition for rehearing was not justified and came too late. HAWTHORNE, J., agrees with the concurring view of McCALEB, J. SANDERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted limited to the question of a remand in the interest of justice. See Article 2164, Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Ellis L. Macaluso applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 188 So.2d 178.

The application is denied. There is no error of law in the judgment complained of.

McCALEB, J., concurs, being of the opinion that plaintiff should have alternatively moved for a non-suit in either the trial court or the Court of Appeal as to his liability insurer. His application for a remand on petition for rehearing was not justified and came too late. HAWTHORNE, J., agrees with the concurring view of McCALEB, J. SANDERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted limited to the question of a remand in the interest of justice. See Article 2164, Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure.

Macaluso v. Watson, 190 So. 2d 910, 249 La. 743, 1966 La. LEXIS 2147 (La. 1966).

Pincite

190 So. 2d 910 (Macaluso v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related