Macalou v. First Unum Life Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 31, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-10439·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ANTICIA MACALOU,

Plaintiff, 2 Civil Action No.1:22-cy-10439 FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE | Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement COMPANY, MCKINSEY & | and Protective Order COMPANY, INC. PLAN, and MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC., □ Defendants.

P. KEVIN CASTEL, United States District Judge: WHEREAS, all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties” and each individually, a “Party’’) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of non-public and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through their respective counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. “Confidential” Materials. “Confidential” materials are documents, Information, testimony or tangible items (“Materials”) so designated by the producing party. A party disclosing or producing the Materials that it believes to be “Confidential” may designate the same as “Confidential” or by using some similar designation, or by designating _[-

in writing (by correspondence or otherwise) that some or all Materials produced are “Confidential.” A party shall make the designation of “Confidential” only as to Materials which that party reasonably and in good faith believes is confidential and entitled to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P.26(c). Any such designation shall be made at the time answers to interrogatories or answers to requests for the production of documents and information are served; or at the time that tangible things or copies of the Materials are furnished to a party conducting such discovery. If upon review any party believes that any Materials designated by a designating party are not “Confidential” as defined herein above, then the party may challenge such designation under the procedures set forth in paragraph 13 below. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified Materials as “Confidential” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as “Confidential” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provision of this Order. 2. scope of “Confidential” Designation. The special treatment accorded the documents designated “Confidential” under this Order shall reach:

(a) All documents designated “Confidential” under the terms of this Order;

(b) All copies of such documents; (c) Any deposition transcript or exhibit, or portion thereof, that discusses such documents; (d) Any portion of any discovery answer or response, affidavit, declaration, brief or other paper, filed with the Court, or as an exhibit to such paper that discusses such documents.

~2-

(e) Any deposition transcript or portion thereof that is designated “Confidential” under the terms of this Order; and (H All information contained in such documents or depositions. 3. Restrictions on Disclosure of “Confidential” Materials. Except with written prior consent of all parties and except as provided elsewhere in this Order, all materials produced in this suit that are designated “Confidential” shall be used solely for the preparation and trial of this action (including any appeals and retrials), and shall not be used for any other purpose, including business, governmental or commercial, or in any other administrative, arbitration or judicial proceedings or actions. Materials designated “Confidential,” and all information in them, may not be disclosed, divulged, revealed, described, paraphrased, quoted, transmitted, disseminated or otherwise communicated to any person other than: (a) The parties to this litigation or Court personnel; (b) Counsel for parties in this suit; (c) Secretaries, paralegal assistants, and all other employees of such counsel who are assisting in the prosecution and/or defense of this suit; (d) Actual or potential deposition or trial witnesses to testify concerning the suit; {e) Outside consultants and experts retained for the purposes of assisting counsel and the parties in the prosecution and/or defense of this suit. 4, Certification of Compliance. No person authorized to receive access to “Confidential” materials under the terms of this Order (except for those persons identified in paragraph 3(a)-(c) of this Order) shall be granted access to them until such person has read this Order and agreed in writing to be bound by it pursuant to the form attached to the Order as Exhibit 1. These written agreements (in the form of Exhibit 1) shall be maintained by counsel for the parties and made available upon Order of the Court to any party. 5. Use of “Confidential” Materials at Depositions. Any “Confidential” Materials -3-

marked as deposition exhibits shall be sealed separately from the remainder of the deposition transcript and exhibits. When a party uses or refers to “Confidential” Materials at a deposition, at the request of the party asserting confidentiality, the portion of the deposition transcript that relates to such documents or information shall be stamped “Confidential” and sealed separately from the remainder of the transcript, and shall be treated as “Confidential” under the provisions of this Order. 6. Designating Portions of the Deposition Transcripts Confidential. Any Party may, within thirty (30) days after receiving a deposition transcript, designate portions of the transcript, or exhibits to it, as being “Confidential.” Confidential deposition testimony or exhibits may be designated by stamping the exhibits “Confidential,” or by underlining the portions of the pages that are confidential and stamping such pages “Confidential.” Until expiration of the 30-day period, the entire deposition transcript, and all exhibits to it, will be treated as confidential under the provisions of this Order. If no party timely designates testimony or exhibits from a deposition as being “Confidential,” none of the deposition testimony or exhibits will be treated as confidential. If a timely “confidential” designation is made, the confidential portions and exhibits shall be sealed separately from the remaining portions of the deposition, subject to the right ‘of any party to challenge such designation under paragraph [3. 7. Use_of “Confidential” Materials in Papers Filed with the Court. Notwithstanding any other provision, no document may be filed with the Clerk under seal without a further Order of this Court addressing specific documents or portions of documents to be sealed. Any application to seal shall be accompanied by an affidavit or affidavits and a memorandum of law, demonstrating that the standards for sealing have been met and specifically addressing the applicability of Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onodaga, 435 F.3d 110, -4-

119-120 (2d Cir. 2006) and any other controlling authority. Unless otherwise ordered, a party seeking to file an opposing party’s Confidential Materials shall so advise the opposing party fourteen (14) days in advance specifying the precise portion of the information the party seeks to use, the general purpose thereof and any redactions to which the party does not object.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Macalou v. First Unum Life Insurance Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Macalou v. First Unum Life Insurance Company (Macalou v. First Unum Life Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)