M.A.C. v. J.E.R.

Missouri Court of Appeals

M.A.C. v. J.E.R.

983 S.W.2d 208, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 6

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 5, 1999

DocketNo. 74198

StatusPublished

This text of 983 S.W.2d 208 (M.A.C. v. J.E.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M.A.C. v. J.E.R., 983 S.W.2d 208, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 6 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother of B.D.C., age 3, and T.A.C., age 2, appeals termination of her parental rights pursuant to Section 211.447.2 RSMo Cum. Supp. 1996. The natural fathers did not appeal the judgments terminating their rights.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the entire record. We conclude there is clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support finding at least one statutory ground for termination of parental rights of mother for each of the two children. This is sufficient to affirm the judgment. In Interest of E.B.S., 876 S.W.2d 8, 10 (Mo.App.S.D. 1994). We find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother of B.D.C., age 3, and T.A.C., age 2, appeals termination of her parental rights pursuant to Section 211.447.2 RSMo Cum. Supp. 1996. The natural fathers did not appeal the judgments terminating their rights.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the entire record. We conclude there is clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support finding at least one statutory ground for termination of parental rights of mother for each of the two children. This is sufficient to affirm the judgment. In Interest of E.B.S., 876 S.W.2d 8, 10 (Mo.App.S.D. 1994). We find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

983 S.W.2d 208, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mac-v-jer-moctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack