Mac A. Degraffinried v. State
This text of Mac A. Degraffinried v. State (Mac A. Degraffinried v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered August 2, 2017
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01359-CR
MAC A. DEGRAFFINRIED, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15050738-86-F
ORDER Appellant’s brief was initially due May 5, 2017. We granted two motions to extend time;
after granting the second motion, we cautioned appellant that the failure to file his brief by July
17 would result in the appeal being abated for a hearing under rule 38.8. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(b)(2). To date, no brief has been filed and appellant has had no communication with the
Court.
Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why
appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings
and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether
appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708
(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which
may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Blair Casey,
Presiding Judge, 86th Judicial District Court; John Daniel Oliphant, Jr., and the Kaufman County
District Attorney Erleigh Wiley.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mac A. Degraffinried v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mac-a-degraffinried-v-state-texapp-2017.