Mac A. Degraffinried v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 2, 2017
Docket05-16-01359-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Mac A. Degraffinried v. State (Mac A. Degraffinried v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mac A. Degraffinried v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order entered August 2, 2017

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01359-CR

MAC A. DEGRAFFINRIED, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15050738-86-F

ORDER Appellant’s brief was initially due May 5, 2017. We granted two motions to extend time;

after granting the second motion, we cautioned appellant that the failure to file his brief by July

17 would result in the appeal being abated for a hearing under rule 38.8. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(b)(2). To date, no brief has been filed and appellant has had no communication with the

Court.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings

and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Blair Casey,

Presiding Judge, 86th Judicial District Court; John Daniel Oliphant, Jr., and the Kaufman County

District Attorney Erleigh Wiley.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mac A. Degraffinried v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mac-a-degraffinried-v-state-texapp-2017.