Mabs, Inc., D/B/A Lancer of California, Snap-Tab Corporation, and Leslie Riverview Realty Corporation v. Piedmont Shirt Company
368 F.2d 570, 151 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 473
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 28, 1966·No. 10525_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
In a carefully considered opinion, the district judge clearly demonstrated the invalidity of the patent. See Mabs, Inc. v. Piedmont Shirt Company, 248 F.Supp. 71 (W.D.S.C.1965). Commendably, he then went further and, assuming its validity, adjudged it not infringed. We agree on both aspects of the case, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district judge.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mabs, Inc., D/B/A Lancer of California, Snap-Tab Corporation, and Leslie Riverview Realty Corporation v. Piedmont Shirt Company, 368 F.2d 570, 151 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 473 (4th Cir. 1966).
368 F.2d 570 (Mabs, Inc., D/B/A Lancer of California, Snap-Tab Corporation, and Leslie Riverview Realty Corporation v. Piedmont Shirt Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lacoste Alligator, S.A. v. Bluestein's Men's Wear, Inc.
569 F. Supp. 491 (D. South Carolina, 1983)
Roller Bearing Co. of America v. Bearings, Inc.
328 F. Supp. 923 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1971)
National Steel Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
313 F. Supp. 934 (D. Maryland, 1970)
Cummins Engine Company v. General Motors Corporation
299 F. Supp. 59 (D. Maryland, 1969)