Mabry v. Theriot

337 So. 2d 1232
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 20, 1976
DocketNo. 11030
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 337 So. 2d 1232 (Mabry v. Theriot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mabry v. Theriot, 337 So. 2d 1232 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

EDWARDS, Judge.

Husband and wife filed suit for personal injuries sustained by husband and for the wife’s mental anguish resulting from injuries to the husband.

An exception of no cause of action filed by the defendant Dr. Eugene Theriot to the demands of the plaintiff Gloria Mabry was sustained by the trial court, and judgment to that effect was signed on January 6, 1976. Notice of judgment was sent to counsel the same day.

A motion to reconsider judgment on exception was filed on January 18, 1976 and denied on February 16,1976.

[1233]*1233On March 5, 1976 plaintiffs moved for and were granted an appeal from the judgment dismissing the wife’s cause of action, and the appeal bond was set at $250.00.

The appeal bond was filed on May 3, 1976. LSA-C.C.P. art. 1974 stipulates that the seven-day delay therein provided for applying for a new trial commences to run the day after the Clerk has mailed notice of signing of judgment when notice of judgment is required pursuant to LSA-C.C.P. art. 1913. Since notice was mailed on January 6, 1976, the last day for timely application for a new trial was January 15, 1976. The motion to reconsider judgment'filed on January 18, 1976 was therefore untimely.

The delay for taking a devolutive appeal is fixed by LSA-C.C.P. art. 2087. At the time that the judgment herein was signed, the delay for taking a devolutive appeal and furnishing security therefor was 90 days from the expiration of the delay for a new trial (where no application for a new trial is filed timely).

Since the 90 day delay expired on April 14, 1976, the appeal bond filed on May 3, 1976 was not timely.

The appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. C & M Freightliner, LLC
97 So. 3d 1191 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
337 So. 2d 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mabry-v-theriot-lactapp-1976.