Mabry v. Tally
This text of 15 La. Ann. 562 (Mabry v. Tally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of dismissal of a writ of sequestration, upon grounds which are identical with those in the case of Wells v. St. Dizier, 9 An. 119.
Upon the authority of that caso, the affidavit for sequestration in the present one must be held sufficient in law. It will be remarked, that although there was a division of opinion among the Judges in Wells v. St. Dizier, upon a question of admissibility of evidence, there was none in relation to the sufficiency of the affidavit for sequestration.
Judgment reversed ; writ of sequestration reinstated, and cause remanded for further proceedings; defendant and appellee to pay costs of appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 La. Ann. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mabry-v-tally-la-1860.