Mabry v. E. Maddox
57 A.D.3d 1000, 869 N.Y.2d 789
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2008·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The determination of the Hearing Officer was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Reyes v Goord, 49 AD3d 546 [2008]; Matter of Igartua v Selsky, 41 AD3d 717 [2007]). There is no evidence in this record that the petitioner was denied her right to call witnesses or otherwise deprived of due process of law.
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mabry v. E. Maddox, 57 A.D.3d 1000, 869 N.Y.2d 789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 1000 (Mabry v. E. Maddox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Charles v. Rockland County Sheriff
2018 NY Slip Op 137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Carlisle v. Lee
96 A.D.3d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Applegate v. Heath
88 A.D.3d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)