Home/Fourth Circuit/Mabery v. Johnson

Mabery v. Johnson

842 F.2d 1291, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617, 1988 WL 25329
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 1988
Docket88-7020
StatusUnpublished

This text of 842 F.2d 1291 (Mabery v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mabery v. Johnson, 842 F.2d 1291, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617, 1988 WL 25329 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

842 F.2d 1291
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Fred MABERY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Aaron JOHNSON; John Patseavouras; A. Locklear; J.C.
Harris; P. Chavis; Mr. Parks; Lt. Stuper; Supt. Griffin;
Lt. Lumsford; Mr. Jackson; Supt. Osborne; Lt. Littrell;
Michael Bumgarner; Ed McMichael; Van Penninger; James
Martin; Dr. Rosefield; J. Barrington; Waylon Collins;
L.C. Snead; Leon Sharp; Dr. Zota; William A. Dudley;
Ofc. Currie; Ofc. East; Ofc. Roth; B. Lett, Ofc.; Dr.
Davenport; J.J. Clark; H. Marsh; Mrs. Wittpen; Mrs.
Lowery, All in their individual and official capacities,
Defendants- Appellees.

No. 88-7020.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 10, 1988.
March 25, 1988.

Fred Mabery, appellant pro se.

Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, deny appellant's request for appointment of counsel, and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Mabery v. Johnson, C/A No. 86-962-CRT (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 1987).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Occidental Chemical Corporation, E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc., Union Carbide Corp., Shell Chemical, Shell Oil Co., Asarco Incorporated, Ciba-Geigy Corp., Ciba-Geigy Limited, Velsicol Corp., Koopers Co. Inc., American Cyanamid Co., Uniroyal Inc., Hercules, Inc., Fmc Corp., Deskins,i.), Kline (B.), Barnes (J.), Diehl (K.), Fogle (S., M.), Savitski (K.), Warrington (B., G.), Morgan (T., L.), Clark (M.), Wagner (C., C.), Cookson (C.), Thompson (D., A.), McGee (M.), Gruss (J
842 F.2d 1291 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 F.2d 1291, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617, 1988 WL 25329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mabery-v-johnson-ca4-1988.