Maberry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Maberry v. State

1911 OK CR 477, 118 P. 1111, 6 Okla. Crim. 666, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 487

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 11, 1911

DocketNo. A-871.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 477 (Maberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maberry v. State, 1911 OK CR 477, 118 P. 1111, 6 Okla. Crim. 666, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 487 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the Criminal Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action, neither of the plaintiffs was arrested in the case, and only seek'to have their goods restored or receive pay for the same with costs, etc. The case being a civil action. For this reason the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the Criminal Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action, neither of the plaintiffs was arrested in the case, and only seek'to have their goods restored or receive pay for the same with costs, etc. The case being a civil action. For this reason the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 477, 118 P. 1111, 6 Okla. Crim. 666, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maberry-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.