Maberry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Maberry v. State

1911 OK CR 477, 118 P. 1111, 6 Okla. Crim. 666, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 487

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 11, 1911·No. No. A-871.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the Criminal Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action, neither of the plaintiffs was arrested in the case, and only seek'to have their goods restored or receive pay for the same with costs, etc. The case being a civil action. For this reason the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the Criminal Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action, neither of the plaintiffs was arrested in the case, and only seek'to have their goods restored or receive pay for the same with costs, etc. The case being a civil action. For this reason the motion to dismiss is sustained.

Maberry v. State, 1911 OK CR 477, 118 P. 1111, 6 Okla. Crim. 666, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 487 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK CR 477 (Maberry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.