Mabel Whayne v. M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc
This text of 397 F.2d 287 (Mabel Whayne v. M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
397 F.2d 287
Mabel WHAYNE, Appellant,
v.
M. V. SHUTTLER, INC., Lea River Lines, Inc., and
Transportation Management Service, Inc.
Nos. 15920, 15921.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Sept. 15, 1967, Reargued May 20, 1968.
Decided June 19, 1968, Certiorari Denied Dec. 9, 1968, See
89 S.Ct. 445.
Avram G. Adler, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Joseph A. Barone, Krusen, Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa. (Robert Cox, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal arises out of civil and admiralty actions brought by Mabel Whayne against M. V. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc. Plaintiff-libellant appeals from orders of the district court vacating service as to M. V. Shuttler, Inc., and Lea River Lines, Inc., and dismissing with prejudice the actions against Transportation Management Service, Inc.
We have carefully reviewed the entire record in this matter and we can find no error. Accordingly, the orders of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 F.2d 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mabel-whayne-v-m-v-shuttler-inc-lea-river-lines-inc-and-ca3-1968.