Mabel M. Hahn v. Sonja L. Ranson, and Universal Underwriters Insurance Company

Sixth Circuit

Mabel M. Hahn v. Sonja L. Ranson, and Universal Underwriters Insurance Company

471 F.2d 610

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 19, 1973·No. 72-1532·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This cause coming on to be considered on the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the oral arguments of counsel, the Court concludes that the District Judge’s determination of the issues presented was correct and that there was no error in the proceedings.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it is hereby affiirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Joseph P. Kinneary, 351 F.Supp. 318.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This cause coming on to be considered on the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the oral arguments of counsel, the Court concludes that the District Judge’s determination of the issues presented was correct and that there was no error in the proceedings.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it is hereby affiirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Joseph P. Kinneary, 351 F.Supp. 318.

Mabel M. Hahn v. Sonja L. Ranson, and Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, 471 F.2d 610 (6th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

471 F.2d 610 (Mabel M. Hahn v. Sonja L. Ranson, and Universal Underwriters Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related