Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Company, Inc.

60 N.E.2d 848, 294 N.Y. 701, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Company, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 N.Y. 781
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 1945·Published

Opinion

Motion by appellants for reargument denied. Motion by appellants to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon this appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon the question whether the respondent was engaged in interstate commerce or in the production of goods for interstate commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. This court held that the respondent was not engaged in interstate commerce or in the production of goods for interstate commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. [See 293 N. Y. 781.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Company, Inc., 60 N.E.2d 848, 294 N.Y. 701, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 903 (N.Y. 1945).

60 N.E.2d 848 (Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Company, Inc.
58 N.E.2d 520 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)