Mabbett v. Kelly

2 How. Pr. 62
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1846
StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 62 (Mabbett v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mabbett v. Kelly, 2 How. Pr. 62 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Opinion

Bronson, Chief Justice.

Judgment has been properly entered on the bail bond for the penalty. But the plaintiffs have made a mistake in executing a writ of inquiry of damages in the bail bond action. (2 R. S. 358, §§ 12,14.) But this void proceeding has not injured the defendants. The plaintiffs have not acted upon it; no execution has been issued on the judgment. Before that is done the plaintiffs will probably assess damages in the original action. If they do not, it will be time enough then to move. At present, there is no irregularity which has injured or can affect the defendants.

Taxing costs without notice is a ground for asking a re-taxation ; but not for setting aside the judgment. Motion denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mabbett-v-kelly-nysupct-1846.