Maass v. Hess

41 Ill. App. 282, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 127
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided July 23, 1891·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Gary, J.

The only question upon this record is whether “The Rational Corporation Reporter,” a weekly publication. of twenty pages, including a colored cover of four pages, three of which are occupied with advertisements, and the front one by the title, and the intermediate ones with reading matter, mainly, but not exclusively, relating to law and finance of interest to corporations, is a newspaper, within the meaning of Sec. 1, Chap. 100, R. S., Hotices. Since the decision of Railton v. Lauder, 126 Ill. 219, it can not be questioned that its contents entitle it to that appellation.

Being published by a corporation, "t is objected that the corporation can not, under that section, make a certificate of the fact of a publication in the paper The words of the section require a “certificate of the publisher by himself or his authorized agent;” yet a woman, under clause 4, or a corporation, under clause 5, of Sec. 1, Chap. 131, R. S., may comply with Sec. 1, Chap. 100.

The order of the Circuit Court, refusing t > set aside a sheriff’s sale, of which notice was published in the Reporter, is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maass v. Hess, 41 Ill. App. 282, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 127 (Ill. Ct. App. 1891).

41 Ill. App. 282 (Maass v. Hess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGraw v. Kerr
23 Colo. App. 163 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1912)
Williams v. Colwell
14 A.D. 26 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Williams v. Colwell
18 Misc. 399 (New York Supreme Court, 1896)