Maas v. Commissioner

Ninth Circuit

Maas v. Commissioner

127 F.2d 863, 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 429, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4005, 29 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 429

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 20, 1942

DocketNo. 10002

StatusPublished

This text of 127 F.2d 863 (Maas v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maas v. Commissioner, 127 F.2d 863, 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 429, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4005, 29 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 429 (9th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The matter of the default of petitioner in making deposit required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, estimated expense of printing transcript of record herein, within the time as required by rule, coming on regularly for hearing, and it appearing from the files of this Court that no deposit has been made, that petitioner is in default, and has failed to respond to -the notice issued by the clerk of this Court that the matter would be presented to the Court on this date; it is ordered that the petition to review in this cause be dismissed for failure of petitioner to make printing deposit, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this Court in this cause issue as provided in rule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The matter of the default of petitioner in making deposit required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, estimated expense of printing transcript of record herein, within the time as required by rule, coming on regularly for hearing, and it appearing from the files of this Court that no deposit has been made, that petitioner is in default, and has failed to respond to -the notice issued by the clerk of this Court that the matter would be presented to the Court on this date; it is ordered that the petition to review in this cause be dismissed for failure of petitioner to make printing deposit, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this Court in this cause issue as provided in rule.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 F.2d 863, 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 429, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4005, 29 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maas-v-commissioner-ca9-1942.