Maas Bros. v. Fuller

163 So. 470, 121 Fla. 175, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1534
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 So. 470 (Maas Bros. v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maas Bros. v. Fuller, 163 So. 470, 121 Fla. 175, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1534 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error states that there are two questions presented in this case. From a perusal of the record, we conceive that there is only one question presented and that is, whether or not there was any evidence which would support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. This is true because the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant.

A careful perusal of the bill of exceptions, which we have considered although its propriety in the record is seriously questioned, shows that there was evidence to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Florida Power & Light Co.
189 So. 705 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 470, 121 Fla. 175, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maas-bros-v-fuller-fla-1935.