M.A. v. M.G., Pet
This text of M.A. v. M.G., Pet (M.A. v. M.G., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
M.A., : No. 156 WAL 2016 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : M.G., : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is whether it is
within the province of a trial court to diagnose a litigant with mental illness when the
record is devoid of any diagnosis by a mental health professional or testimony by a
mental health professional to support the diagnosis?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
M.A. v. M.G., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ma-v-mg-pet-pa-2016.