M.A. v. M.G.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

M.A. v. M.G.

139 A.3d 1256

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 17, 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is whether it is within the province of a trial court to diagnose a litigant with mental illness when the record is devoid of any diagnosis by a mental health professional or testimo[1257] ny by a mental health professional to support the diagnosis?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is whether it is within the province of a trial court to diagnose a litigant with mental illness when the record is devoid of any diagnosis by a mental health professional or testimo[1257] ny by a mental health professional to support the diagnosis?

M.A. v. M.G., 139 A.3d 1256 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

139 A.3d 1256 (M.A. v. M.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.