M. Zimmerman Co. v. Grohs

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

M. Zimmerman Co. v. Grohs

147 N.Y.S. 46

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 147 N.Y.S. 46 (M. Zimmerman Co. v. Grohs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. Zimmerman Co. v. Grohs, 147 N.Y.S. 46 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

This action was brought to recover for goods sold and delivered. The only evidence on which it was sought to charge the defendant personally for the goods, which were delivered to a delica[47]*47tessen store, was that he had told plaintiff’s driver that he was the “boss.” Moreover, defendant proved, without contradiction, that the-store was owned and operated by his mother, and that he had not at the time attained his majority by over a year.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs to appellant. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

This action was brought to recover for goods sold and delivered. The only evidence on which it was sought to charge the defendant personally for the goods, which were delivered to a delica[47]*47tessen store, was that he had told plaintiff’s driver that he was the “boss.” Moreover, defendant proved, without contradiction, that the-store was owned and operated by his mother, and that he had not at the time attained his majority by over a year.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs to appellant. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 N.Y.S. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-zimmerman-co-v-grohs-nyappterm-1914.