M. V. T. Corp. v. Mount Vernon Lodge No. 842 BenevoLent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America

263 A.D. 849, 31 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5251

Opinion

In an action to recover an unpaid balance of interest on a mortgage indebtedness, order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer and for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. Appellant’s offer to accept less than the amount due on respondent’s indebtedness was revocable before acceptance by performance. (Petterson v. Pattberg, 248 N. Y. 86.) No material fact is in dispute. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M. V. T. Corp. v. Mount Vernon Lodge No. 842 BenevoLent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America, 263 A.D. 849, 31 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

263 A.D. 849 (M. V. T. Corp. v. Mount Vernon Lodge No. 842 BenevoLent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petterson v. Pattberg
161 N.E. 428 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)