M. Steinert & Sons Co. v. Gironda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

M. Steinert & Sons Co. v. Gironda

138 N.Y.S. 1130

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 138 N.Y.S. 1130 (M. Steinert & Sons Co. v. Gironda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M. Steinert & Sons Co. v. Gironda, 138 N.Y.S. 1130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order of the-County Court of Westchester County reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the allowance of defendant’s counterclaim was not supported by competent evidence, and that, if the defendant was entitled to possession of the chattel, then the judgment should have awarded him possession, or his damages should have been fixed at the reasonable value of the chattel, less the amount due and unpaid thereon under the contract of conditional sale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order of the-County Court of Westchester County reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the allowance of defendant’s counterclaim was not supported by competent evidence, and that, if the defendant was entitled to possession of the chattel, then the judgment should have awarded him possession, or his damages should have been fixed at the reasonable value of the chattel, less the amount due and unpaid thereon under the contract of conditional sale.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 N.Y.S. 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-steinert-sons-co-v-gironda-nyappdiv-1912.